A federal judge has temporarily blocked the Trump administration’s attempt to bar Harvard University from enrolling international students, granting the university immediate relief in an escalating legal battle over immigration policy and academic independence.
Background
On May 23, 2025, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) revoked Harvard’s certification under the Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP), effectively stripping the university of its ability to enroll or host international students and scholars. The administration cited concerns over campus safety, antisemitism, and alleged ties to foreign governments. Harvard swiftly filed a lawsuit, arguing that the move violated the First Amendment, the Due Process Clause, and the Administrative Procedure Act. The university contended that the action was retaliatory, stemming from its refusal to comply with federal demands regarding student records and institutional governance.
Legal Relief
U.S. District Judge Allison D. Burroughs issued a temporary restraining order preventing the government from enforcing the SEVP revocation. The court found that the policy posed an “immediate and irreparable injury” to Harvard and its international student body, which comprises approximately 7,000 students. The ruling ensures that current and incoming international students can maintain their visa status and continue their studies without disruption.
Legal Representation
Harvard’s legal team includes prominent law firms such as WilmerHale, with partners Felicia Ellsworth and Seth Waxman leading the case. Their expertise has been instrumental in securing temporary relief and challenging the administration’s policy on legal grounds.
Broader Implications
This legal confrontation is part of a broader pattern of tensions between the Trump administration and elite academic institutions. In addition to the SEVP revocation, the administration has frozen over $2 billion in federal funding to Harvard and has threatened to revoke its tax-exempt status. These actions have raised concerns about governmental overreach and the politicization of higher education.
The next court hearing is scheduled for May 27, 2025, where further arguments will be presented. The outcome of this case could have significant ramifications for international students across the United States and the autonomy of educational institutions in matters of admissions and governance.