Former U.S. President Donald Trump has sparked fresh controversy after claiming that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy “hasn’t even read” a peace proposal from the United States, escalating tensions amid ongoing conflict with Russia. Trump suggested that Washington had presented a plan aimed at ending the war, but accused Kyiv of refusing to acknowledge it.
Speaking to reporters, Trump alleged that the Ukrainian government is either delaying or avoiding engagement with peace options supported by U.S. officials. He criticized Zelenskyy for what he called a “lack of willingness to negotiate,” while insisting that a diplomatic path remains possible if both sides show commitment.
Ukrainian officials, however, contend that no formal peace proposal has been shared through official channels, and emphasize that Ukraine will not consider any deal that compromises sovereignty or territorial integrity. They argue that peace cannot be achieved under coercion or under terms favorable to Moscow.
The remarks come at a sensitive moment, as Western nations debate military aid, ceasefire strategies, and future security guarantees for Ukraine. Trump’s comments have triggered political debate in Washington, with analysts noting that public statements on peace talks can influence international diplomacy and battlefield morale.
As pressure mounts on both Kyiv and Moscow, the question remains whether any genuine peace framework exists — and if so, who is willing to read it, accept it, or negotiate it.
