US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has said that “significant progress” has been made in ongoing talks with Iran, even as former US President Donald Trump claimed that a potential agreement with Tehran has been “largely negotiated.” The remarks come amid intense diplomatic efforts aimed at easing tensions in the Middle East and reopening the strategically important Strait of Hormuz.
Speaking after high-level meetings in Sweden and during ongoing discussions with international mediators, Rubio said the United States remains committed to a diplomatic solution but stressed that major issues still need to be resolved. He noted that Washington’s primary concern continues to be preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.
Trump, meanwhile, stated that a memorandum of understanding between the United States, Iran, and several regional stakeholders is close to finalization. According to reports, the proposed framework includes steps to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, ease regional tensions, and begin broader negotiations over Iran’s nuclear program.
The Strait of Hormuz remains one of the world’s most critical oil shipping routes, and any disruption there has significant implications for global energy markets. Diplomatic sources say the current talks also involve discussions on sanctions relief, uranium enrichment limits, and the possible transfer of Iran’s highly enriched uranium stockpiles.
Rubio cautioned against excessive optimism, saying that while progress has been made, “we’re not there yet.” He added that the US continues to communicate closely with mediators, including Pakistani officials, who are helping facilitate negotiations between Washington and Tehran.
Iranian officials, however, have responded cautiously to Trump’s statements, with some reports suggesting that parts of the proposed agreement are still under discussion and not yet finalized. Analysts say that despite positive signs, deep mistrust between the two nations remains a major obstacle.
The developments have drawn mixed reactions internationally. Supporters believe a successful agreement could help stabilize the Middle East and reduce global economic uncertainty, while critics argue that any deal must ensure long-term restrictions on Iran’s nuclear ambitions.
